Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
PLUS+1 GUIDE / Re: A system with multiple controllers - GUIDE project architecture
« Last post by Matt on October 06, 2025, 05:03:53 PM »
When we can use the IO modules we do so, but they do not always suit.

I have also been creating a GUIDE project per ECU, then writing CAN TX/RX to communicate among them.

I'm curious what the additional controllers are providing that the IO modules don't already provide. Is it just a need to distribute logic? So far I've tested one MC and several IO (combination of IOX and OX) and didn't seem to hit a roadblock that would require a controller instead of an IO module.

In multi-ECU systems, I typically designate one ECU as the primary controller, while the remaining units operate as distributed I/O modules. The control logic resides entirely within the primary ECU and is communicated via CAN to the secondary ECUs

In the case of a controller, a display, and IO modules, I've taken a similar approach. However I have found it tedious to write the CAN messaging between the controller and display whereas the IO modules come with that already included.
52
Displays / Re: DM1200T Displaying Licence PDF
« Last post by samuelhj on October 05, 2025, 06:42:26 PM »
Been a while since I worked on a new project involving these displays, but if I recall correctly you need to delete the licence page within the main Application.
53
PLUS+1 GUIDE / Re: A system with multiple controllers - GUIDE project architecture
« Last post by Fredrick on October 03, 2025, 10:07:19 AM »
In multi-ECU systems, I typically designate one ECU as the primary controller, while the remaining units operate as distributed I/O modules. The control logic resides entirely within the primary ECU and is communicated via CAN to the secondary ECUs
54
Displays / DM1200T Displaying Licence PDF
« Last post by NickHankin on October 03, 2025, 10:03:14 AM »
Hi,

I'm a very new user of Plus+1, this may be a really obvious solution.

I am programming a DM1200T to be used as a display for giving live sensor readings on a vehicle.

Whilst waiting for the screen to arrive, i developed the programming for a 430 screen and tested it. This is worked well.

I made the same program on the DM1200T template and when it arrived, i uploaded the program using the service tool and the file downloaded successfully. But the HMI is only showing the licence agreement PDF. I can scroll though it but that's all i have.

Am i missing something with the new type screens that i must do in the programming, or have i got a faulty unit?

Thank you, nick
55
Communication / Re: ISOBus
« Last post by ToPe on September 23, 2025, 08:54:52 AM »
ISOBUS Video are available now on our PLUS+1 YouTube Channel
#135 PLUS+1 ISOBUS Training Introduction and Overview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAsvkkWbuOw

#136 PLUS+1 ISOBUS Training Software Package
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evpf-4gUEX8&t=2s
56
Hello anpham,

This sounds strange.  Does the Service Tool state that the unit is in Bootloader or isn't the unit found?

Some things to check.
- Recovery ECU  (already done)
- Check cables and connectors
- Test with a second controller to check that all connections and tools are working.

If you don't find a solution, please create a case for PLUS+1 Helpdesk:  https://www.danfoss.com/en/campaigns/dps/plusplus1-support-form/

Thank you.
57
Displays / QT Design Studio
« Last post by ZanInno on September 22, 2025, 10:04:20 PM »
Has anyone used QT design studio for Danfoss HMI development?  Any thoughts or comments around the ease or speed of development?
58
Hi,

I had an accident with the power supply during software downloading to MC050-120. I tried to used the "System/Recover ECU" to recover it but was not successful.
Is there anyway other way to recover the MC050-120?

Best regards,
59
PLUS+1 GUIDE / Re: Is there a method to use namespace in set value signal names?
« Last post by davidNeedsHelp on September 12, 2025, 07:32:23 PM »
(Solved it, answering my own question here :) haha)


Hey user who I don't know personally!


What a great question! You must be quite the inquisitive (and probably pretty fun) individual!

If you read the manual (as you should always do before reaching out to a message board :(), you can find "Cloud Set Value". Using this component, and leaving the cloud connection parameter set to false, serves the same purpose as a regular set parameter, with namespace tagged on the front.


Happy GUIDEing!

~D
60
PLUS+1 GUIDE / Is there a method to use namespace in set value signal names?
« Last post by davidNeedsHelp on September 12, 2025, 05:43:14 PM »
Hey Community,


I've got a bunch of "linked" pages (linked in the sense that behaviour is the same, but they're not actually linked pages because of the reason here), with the only difference between being the namespace, and the fact that I have to manually go into each page to change the set value signal name for each page to match the namespace.

Is there a way to use namespace as the prefix on a set signal name, so that I don't have to enter each page manually, or a workaround that accomplishes this same goal? Similar to the behaviour of "Advanced Checkpoint with Namespace", I want to implement a "Setpoint with Namespace". It would make my life just a little easier  :)


Hoping for help! Thanks!

~D
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10