91
Off topic / who invented plus+1 as programming language?
« Last post by GiulioDallanese on January 31, 2023, 01:53:20 PM »as the subject...
just out of my curiosity...
just out of my curiosity...
Recent Posts
92
PLUS+1 Service Tool / Re: ServiceTool 2022.4.6
« Last post by Tor on January 31, 2023, 07:16:03 AM »Hello,
Yes, the "Indicated changed value" is reported as a bug (CQ: P100006548).
The difference between Online and Offline mode is nothing I have seen or heard about. I will add that as well.
Don't hesitate to report these things to the PLUS+1 Helpdesk: https://danfoss.my.salesforce-sites.com/dpscustomersupport
Then the issues will be reported a little quicker.
Thanks for letting us know.
Yes, the "Indicated changed value" is reported as a bug (CQ: P100006548).
The difference between Online and Offline mode is nothing I have seen or heard about. I will add that as well.
Don't hesitate to report these things to the PLUS+1 Helpdesk: https://danfoss.my.salesforce-sites.com/dpscustomersupport
Then the issues will be reported a little quicker.
Thanks for letting us know.
93
PLUS+1 Service Tool / Re: ServiceTool 2022.4.6
« Last post by Fredrick on January 30, 2023, 06:23:06 PM »Anyone else seeing this problem in the latest ServiceTool?
94
General controls / Re: Test Tool and H1_EDC_Ang_Snsr Block
« Last post by OtherPete on January 30, 2023, 03:50:40 PM »Thanks for replying again Matt, I've been working on another project in January so this is the first chance I've had to come back to this.
I've included screenshots of the test page, and the In, Expected and Actual values from the test table.
The test table calibrates the block to the point where status and statexp are zero, but then when I give it a signal power value that takes my input ratio to 100% the block doesn't output a fault signal after the fault detection time elapses (1000ms).
I've included screenshots of the test page, and the In, Expected and Actual values from the test table.
The test table calibrates the block to the point where status and statexp are zero, but then when I give it a signal power value that takes my input ratio to 100% the block doesn't output a fault signal after the fault detection time elapses (1000ms).
95
Code sharing / Re: String Concatenate C Code POU
« Last post by AlbertMilani on January 28, 2023, 03:24:37 AM »This seems to be working great except if I have any other error, I also get this warning:
I changed the code to do what the warning recommended, 'Save expression into temporary variable to avoid uncertainty" and that warning doesn't happen anymore.
Albert
Code: [Select]
*** WARNING 447:1105 *** [PLC2C] PLC Code Compilation Warning {String of default length will be returned,
which may be less than expected length. Save expression into temporary variable to avoid uncertainty.}
Line: [ 1 ] in implementation of StrConcat_NativeI changed the code to do what the warning recommended, 'Save expression into temporary variable to avoid uncertainty" and that warning doesn't happen anymore.
Albert
96
PLUS+1 Service Tool / Re: Looking for connecting to PVED-CC Serie 4
« Last post by Stephane on January 23, 2023, 09:45:13 AM »Thank you very much, i found the PVED S4. Great!
97
PLUS+1 Service Tool / Re: Looking for connecting to PVED-CC Serie 4
« Last post by FluidPowerTom on January 20, 2023, 06:09:30 PM »You'll want to use the PLUS+1 Update Center and find it in there. I also look on the website first often times, and when I can't find it there the Helpdesk always says to use the Update Center software to find it. The Update Center comes with the GUIDE platform.
98
Controllers / Re: SC050 examples
« Last post by macbahi on January 20, 2023, 03:12:51 PM »Hello Tor
Thank you very much sir.
It's a shame because I thought the controller was redundant.
Now please if an output is enabled on the primary but I don't want it to be conditioned on the secondary. I can do False DisableOutput. If there is a problem, can the primary do its safety job despite the secondary output Disableoutput being forced to False.
Please my last question: is it possible to do the test. In other words, how to be convinced that SIL2 is done.
Thanks
Cordially
Thank you very much sir.
It's a shame because I thought the controller was redundant.
Now please if an output is enabled on the primary but I don't want it to be conditioned on the secondary. I can do False DisableOutput. If there is a problem, can the primary do its safety job despite the secondary output Disableoutput being forced to False.
Please my last question: is it possible to do the test. In other words, how to be convinced that SIL2 is done.
Thanks
Cordially
99
Controllers / Re: SC050 examples
« Last post by Tor on January 20, 2023, 07:10:28 AM »Hello,
No, you cannot use the secondary processor as a redundant unit if the first one breaks down. If you look at the template for the secondary you only have "DisableOutput" as a signal out.
What you can do is to have your own code in the secondary processor to monitor specific safety functions that can shut down the output. But again, I recommend you to read the safety manual before doing so.
Have a nice day.
No, you cannot use the secondary processor as a redundant unit if the first one breaks down. If you look at the template for the secondary you only have "DisableOutput" as a signal out.
What you can do is to have your own code in the secondary processor to monitor specific safety functions that can shut down the output. But again, I recommend you to read the safety manual before doing so.
Have a nice day.
100
Controllers / Re: SC050 examples
« Last post by macbahi on January 19, 2023, 11:39:05 PM »Hello Tor,
Thank you very much for your information:
The secondary processor is there to check that the first processor is working correct (to achieve SIL2) and shut down the outputs if it's not. This is already done in the background, without you adding any logic.
But please If I want use the secondary as redundant processor, Is it possible to do that?
As example if there is any problem with an output in the primary processor, normally the controller will switch to the secondary processor to keep the output available.
Thanks in advance for your help
With best regards
Thank you very much for your information:
The secondary processor is there to check that the first processor is working correct (to achieve SIL2) and shut down the outputs if it's not. This is already done in the background, without you adding any logic.
But please If I want use the secondary as redundant processor, Is it possible to do that?
As example if there is any problem with an output in the primary processor, normally the controller will switch to the secondary processor to keep the output available.
Thanks in advance for your help
With best regards