Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
PLUS+1 News / Developer's Conference 2023
« Last post by FluidPowerTom on November 22, 2022, 06:09:38 PM »
Who else is excited for a 2023 Developer's Conference?  Can we get confirmation?
92
PLUS+1 GUIDE / Plus+1 Guide 2022.3 Version
« Last post by CERTEN on November 22, 2022, 06:59:14 AM »
I saved the last file I worked with in this version.After some work it started to open no files.I have windows 11 pro installed.I don't work.Can you help me please?
93
PLUS+1 Service Tool / Re: WARNING! Service Tool 2022.3.7
« Last post by Tor on November 17, 2022, 08:04:37 AM »
Hello,

I talked to the PLUS+1 Service Tool developers and found out that you are correct. There is an issue with importing XML files.
As far as I understood, the problem occurs when there is a difference between the XML list you import and the parameter list in the Service Tool. I don't have any more details.

My recommendation is to use the 2022.2 version until this is fixed.

Sorry about any inconvenience.

94
PLUS+1 Service Tool / WARNING! Service Tool 2022.3.7
« Last post by Fredrick on November 16, 2022, 07:43:06 PM »
Hi, I just downloaded the latest ServiceTool and it has a serious and dangerous bug when importing parameter files, see attached pictures for an example.

The parameters "Transport_Page1_Enable" and "Transport_Page10_Enable" are Booleans but when I import the parameters into the parameter list in the latest ServiceTool it looks like the values from "Transport_Hinge_Flow_A" and "Transport_Hinge_Flow_B" is used instead of the actual values in the XML file.  :o

Same happens with other parameters in the list as well.
95
Controllers / Create an Array or Ports SC050-13H
« Last post by anthony on November 09, 2022, 08:53:30 PM »
Hi,

As the title suggests, is there a way to put a CAN port into an array? Something similar to Arrays[0] = CAN[0].port and Arrays[1] = CAN[1].port. Each element has type Port

Thanks,


Anthony
96
Controllers / Re: SC024_C2P07 FeddBackCurrent
« Last post by pinias on November 09, 2022, 04:24:39 PM »
ahh those variables are in the input side..

 >:( i pulled my air out for days trying to figure it out...man

cool, great

thanks for the hint guys
 :D
97
Controllers / Re: SC024_C2P07 FeddBackCurrent
« Last post by macbahi on November 09, 2022, 03:11:21 PM »
Hi Pinias,

Yes you can.  As acmall show you. 
I use SC024-120.
The problem is if your load exceeds more than 3A the feedbackcurrent value is not correct.  I think is baug problem.
For my SC024 test the current output is more than 5A without overload but feedbackcurrent is not correct.
So if your load is equal or less then 3A the FeedbackCurrent value is exact.

With best regards

98
Controllers / Re: SC024_C2P07 FeddBackCurrent
« Last post by acmall on November 09, 2022, 09:18:59 AM »
It is also possible to see the current on the MC controllers. Depending on which controller (and possibly HWD version) it may be called FeedBackCurrent or FeedBackValue.

If you want to read it in your program you will find it on the input bus for each pin. Attached screen shot is form MC050-110.
99
Controllers / Re: SC024_C2P07 FeddBackCurrent
« Last post by pinias on November 09, 2022, 12:21:43 AM »
Guys,

So does that mean that I can read the actual current consumption by the load -with the SC controllers output-?

Currently on the MC controllers the "current output" is only a value that tells you what current output the controller can supply, not necesarily is the current consumption by the load or in other words it is not the real current consumption by the load.

I got an aplication where I choke the current going to my load, at the controller it tells me the current out is 500mA however my load sees only 20mA becuase of my rheostat, I really would like to see what current is been drawn by the load instead of what current the controller can possible supply.

so, Can the SC version do that? 
looks like it only is possible with the service tool, at the PIN configuration I see no any feedback current choice to be read, am I correct on this?

Thank you for the feedback

Regards

100
Controllers / Re: Possible for ExecTime of 3.0 ms or less?
« Last post by FluidPowerTom on November 08, 2022, 10:28:14 PM »
That's encouraging that you're able to get 1 or 2ms scan times.  This will be a very light application, and if I focus on efficiency then maybe it will work out.

It's not a CAN message that I need to receive that often.  It's an analog voltage sensor.  So, I figure I should be able to pick up the sensor value every scan.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]